We can understand the concern of Democratic thinking regarding the shifting sands of time drifting away from their open border position in the state of Texas having U.S. Representative Colin Alred facing incumbent Senator Ted Cruz whose position supports closed borders. Millions of dollars are in the coffers of the Democratic Party contributed from sources outside of Texas to MUSTER the voters favoring the Democratic candidates to have the best chance of defeating every Texas Republican. In former times the most predictable degree of support for a candidate would be found in the amount of monetary support a candidate could receive from his constituency. Now it seems the TV advertising will invade TV audience time for as long as the money lasts. The more the money the more the voices from the candidates. Would that the voices spoke of issues, policies, and plans for execution? But we must listen to opinions of how unfit the opposition candidate is to hold the contended office or how like some despicable historical figure the opposition is alleged to be. If in this case, Ted Cruz wins election 2024 Texas Senate seat (betting odds favor him), would not the millions in opposition to him be better spent by the opposition on some charitable outreach to a noble cause such as hurricane relief given in the name of all Texas Democratic candidates. Much kinder thoughts are gendered by such action than thoughts that outside money unduly influenced the election process of Texas. It is further noted that Senator Cruz has often taken practical positions along with Democrats in support of economic policies that benefit of all Texas citizens.
Now to the BLUSTER part. We are given to understand that the Democratic national Presidential campaign now has a BILLION dollars to spend between this date and November 5, 2024. Part of that money was in place because of the BIDEN-HARRIS campaign contributions that could go to no other candidate than Joe Biden or Kamala Harris, thus the selection without election by a single vote of Democratic constituents or their representatives. The motive to anoint Kamala Harris was evident in the ever-decreasing voter support for Joe Biden. But we ask: “How Democratic is this action?” The convention would have appeared more democratic to have had at least one vote by delegates confirming the selected successor to Biden. Now what? Here comes the BLUSTER, unending repetition of verbiage that by in large will not change any partisan minds and has little content to inform the voter of the likely position of the Democratic Party on future issues.
We at ivotemyvote.com urge all voters to participate in elections as a civil duty with as somber a responsibility as any soldier, sailor, marine, air force or coast guard or first responder. Do not let apathy have a significant impact on any election.
